S.C. Revisited

Officer.com is revisiting the Supreme Court decision restricting searches when both parties conflict on consent.

Like I said I agree with the S.C. in siding with the least-intrusion to investigate a crime, even to the point of losing a case. But they did not give any guidance in a domestic dispute situation where people go to hosptals and die. I guess that guarantees them a few more years of assured bench salary to wait until a case-law trial comes up to them.

And yeah, that officer writing the article is a bit negative on being restricted. Who isn't when it comes to job restrictions? He just doesn't realise what makes his life easier could backfire on him if his family get ticked off about his attitude.